W/O trailer trailer full load trailer no load
Ride length: 24.59 km 24.48 km 24.6 km
Time: 52 min 29 sec 51min 19 sec 51 min 28 sec
Av. speed: 28.1 km/h 28.6 km/h 28.6 km/h
Power usage:
6.85 Ah 9.81 Ah 7.92 Ah
386.06 Wh 501.27 Wh 414.39 Wh
15.7 Wh/km 20.6 Wh/km 16.7 Wh/km
Max speed: 45.0 km/h 35.5 km/h 42.9 km/h
Start voltage 58.2 58.2 58.2
Finish voltage 53.0 50.9 52.0
Tonight's test was to find the energy cost of the trailer's rolling resistance. The trailer was without any load and the aerodynamic profile was nearly zero because it is only a platform with no sides.
At an average speed of roughly 28 km/h the trailer adds about 1.0 Wh/km over the bike without `the trailer. Since the difference in energy consumption between Bike Alone and Bike With Trailer, this leaves the energy cost of the trailer's battery load at about 3.9 Wh/km. This represents the energy cost of the aerodynamic resistance and the added weight.
I will separate these two factors next time out by just loading the empty containers. The empty containers plus trailer weight are about 25%, or so, of the total load weight so, while the new figure will not completely separate out the weight from the aerodynamic resistance, it will still reveal good intel about the effect of weight on overall energy cost.
Once the testing is complete I will have a very good idea of the percentages of energy consumption for rolling resistance, aerodynamic resistance, and inertial (weight) resistance.
Above is my Wike heavy duty flatbed trailer.
Weight 19 lbs.
Carrying capacity 125 lbs.
Tonight's test was to find the energy cost of the trailer's rolling resistance. The trailer was without any load and the aerodynamic profile was nearly zero because it is only a platform with no sides.
At an average speed of roughly 28 km/h the trailer adds about 1.0 Wh/km over the bike without `the trailer. Since the difference in energy consumption between Bike Alone and Bike With Trailer, this leaves the energy cost of the trailer's battery load at about 3.9 Wh/km. This represents the energy cost of the aerodynamic resistance and the added weight.
I will separate these two factors next time out by just loading the empty containers. The empty containers plus trailer weight are about 25%, or so, of the total load weight so, while the new figure will not completely separate out the weight from the aerodynamic resistance, it will still reveal good intel about the effect of weight on overall energy cost.
Once the testing is complete I will have a very good idea of the percentages of energy consumption for rolling resistance, aerodynamic resistance, and inertial (weight) resistance.
No comments:
Post a Comment